Plants in the boreal zone have a clear annual rhythm. The dormancy period in winter is followed by the onset of development and growth in spring. Growth, reproduction and largely photosynthesis occur during the active period, and these functions fall into dormancy in the autumn (Fig. 1). Timing of individual phenological events such as bud burst have been studied widely and for a long time (Linkosalo et al. 2008). Phenological events can be momentary such as bud burst or the opening of catkins (Sarvas 1972) or it can be continuous such as growth.
We have studied and quantified the annual cycle of photosynthesis (Suni et al. 2003, Mäkelä et al. 2004), organ growth and carbon allocation (Schiestl-Aalto et al. 2015) and the storage of non-structural carbon compounds in trees (Schielst-Aalto et al. 2019). The results of these studies have implications on the interactions between phenology and climate change. They also contribute to the discussion of source-sink interactions in growth.
This text was from Schiestl-Aalto (2017) Modelling intra- and inter-annual growth dynamics of Scots pine in the whole-tree carbon framework, Academic dissertation.
Caffarra A., Donnelly A. 2011. The ecological significance of phenology in four different tree species: effects of light and temperature on bud burst. International Journal of Biometeorology 55: 711-721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00484-010-0386-1
Chuine I., Morin X., Bugmann H. 2010. Warming, Photoperiods and Tree Phenology. Science 329: 277-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5989.277-e
Hänninen H., Kramer K. 2007. A framework for modelling the annual cycle of trees in boreal and temperate regions. Silva Fennica 41: 167-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/sf.313
Hari P. 1972. Physiological stage of development in biological models of growth and maturation. Annales Botanici Fennici 9: 107-115
Hari P., Häkkinen R. 1991. The utilization of old phenological time series of budburst to compare models describing annual cycles of plants. Tree Physiology 8: 281-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/8.3.281
Koski V., Sievänen R. 1985. Timing of growth cessation in relation to the variations in the growing season. In P.M.A. Tigerstedt, P. Puttonen and V. Koski (eds): Crop Physiology Forest Trees. Helsinki University Press, Helsinki pp. 167-193
Laube J., Sparks TH., Estrella N., Menzel A. 2014. Does humidity trigger tree phenology? Proposal for an air humidity based framework for bud development in spring. New Phytologist 202: 350-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12680
Linkosalo T., Carter TR., Häkkinen R., Hari P. 2000. Predicting spring phenology and frost damage risk of Betula spp. under climatic warming: a comparison of two models. Tree Physiology 20: 1175-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.17.1175
Linkosalo T., Lappalainen HK., Hari P. 2008. A comparison of phenological models of leaf bud burst and flowering of boreal trees using independent observations. Tree physiology 28: 1873-1882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/28.12.1873
Linkosalo T., Häkkinen R., Terhivuo J., Tuomenvirta H., Hari P. 2009. The time series of flowering and leaf bud burst of boreal trees (1846-2005) support the direct temperature observations of climatic warming. Agricultural and forest meteorology 149: 453-461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.09.006
de Réaumur R-AF. 1735. Observations du thermomètre, faites à Paris pendant l´année 1735 comparées avec celles qui ont été faites sous la ligne à l′Ile de France, à Alger et en quelques-unes de nosîles de l′Amérique. Mémoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences de Paris 1735: 545–576.
Sarvas R. 1972. Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees. Active period. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 76: 1-110
Suni T., Berninger F., Vesala T., Markkanen T., Hari P. et al. 2003. Air temperature triggers the recovery of evergreen boreal forest photosynthesis in spring. Global change biology 9: 1410-1426. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00597.x
Way DA. 2011. Tree phenology responses to warming: spring forward, fall back? Tree Physiology 31: 469-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpr044