Review criteria EARLI SIG1
All contributions are subject to double blind peer review based on the quality of the research that is being presented.
The criteria for a paper, symposium and poster are:
- Overall quality and scientific originality
- Significance for theory, practice and policy
- Theoretical framework
- Research method and design
- Relevance to the domain of Assessment and Evaluation
- Clarity of (preliminary) results, discussion and conclusions
The criteria for a roundtable and workshop/demonstration are:
- Overall quality and scientific originality
- Significance for theory, practice and policy
- Relevance to the domain of Assessment and Evaluation
- Clarity of the theme to be discussed
- For workshop/demonstration also the “proposed interactivity”
Please use the submission template for all submissions:
To submit your contribution, please use the online tool.